Wednesday 31 October 2012

Re: Getz Bros & Co (S) Pte. Ltd.. SIA GETZ ARCHITECTURAL AWARD FOR EMERGING ARCHITECTURE OF ASIA.

On Oct 31, 2012 12:35 PM, "limcheoksiang" <limcheoksiang@gmail.com> wrote:


Subject: Getz Bros & Co (S) Pte. Ltd.


Laureate Prof Dr Ar JIMMY C S LIM,  SIA Getz Prize Citation by PAM President, 17th October 2012
 
When I was asked to say a few words about the SIA-GETZ Architecture Prize 2012 Laureate recipient, I accepted immediately as I am truly honored and delighted to be given the task.
 
I first knew the recipient over 30  years ago after I graduated from university and returned home to Malaysia to register myself as a PAM graduate member and subsequently attended to some of his talks and lectures. And of course he was also PAM President (1991-1993).
 
He is a man of many talents and faces:  Master Architect, Conservationist, Urban Planner, Interior Designer and as what one would say, A Man of All Seasons.
 
Being presented as Master Architect by Mastercard in the early 90's  landed himself into a host of problems with both the Malaysian Board of Architects and public controversy and even ruffled a few feathers in Singapore. But he rode the storm and lived through that period in his usual combative manner.  It is ironic that today, Architects can be the face to represent products but still cannot label oneself as a Master of our craft.
 
Way before Green and Sustainability became the current buzz words, in the 80's he was already pushing the sustainable and green agenda in his design work.
 
The idea of orientation, passive cooling, natural and through ventilation, and use of local materials were all factors that he carefully considered in his architecture.
 
Three landmark houses of his come to mind, his own house, the Schneider House and the Walian House, which exemplify the best of his body of work.  
 
The Schneider and Walian Houses epitomize the best in tropical house design, with the innovative use of timber, the soaring roof and the open plan design.  The open-plan living spaces and the outdoor shower that open to the skies are all features that are being copied in the many current so-called Balinese and tropical houses.
 
His own house, a 1960's developer spec house, that has been re-modeled by him to beyond recognition, is organic as it is never finished as he has been adding on to it in bits and pieces for the last 30 years. His house is a mix-and-match of timber and bricks and canton floor tiles, but delightfully so, of old discarded timber structures, doors and windows and broken tiles and ceramic floor tiles, all cleverly re-cycled and re-used.
 
The story goes that if you are demolishing an old building, you just send the discarded old materials to his house and he would find a use for them.  The old louvered windows that we threw out from the PAM Centre at Jalan Tangsi were salvaged by him and guess what! On one of our visits to his house, we saw them installed as windows.
 
 
Similarly the old ceramic tiles that he salvaged from a house in Penang were broken up and painstakingly re-assembled in an artistic sunburst pattern at his entrance porch.
 
When asked whether he had obtained the Certificate of Fitness for the extensive extensions made to his house, he laughed and replied that his house is still undergoing renovation exercise, so that the application for CF is still premature.
 
This is Jimmy Lim Cheok Siang for you!  Full of tricks, for remember, he was born in the year of the Monkey.
 
However and in whichever way that you see him, Jimmy Lim is regarded as one of the pioneers in the search for a Malaysian architectural idiom.  Over the years, he has worked closely with craftsmen of the trade in mutual partnership.  
 
He is an early proponent regarding the primary use of locally derived materials in his architecture.   He showed a deep regard for the confluence of natural light, vernacular building technology, material and textural quality at a time when his contemporaries were more concerned about imported architecture means and processes.  Jimmy, practising architecture under his own terms, took architecture as seriously as it deserved, to the chagrin of most other regional practitioners.
 
Today his work and his influence have endured and encourage future exploration and developments with future generation.
 
Prof Ar. Jimmy Lim Cheok Siang, you rightly deserve the 2012 SIA-GETZ Architecture Prize. I, PAM, and definitely all Malaysians are very proud of you.
 
Congratulations!
 
 
Speech by the Laureate of the SIA Getz Prize for Emergent Asian Architecture.
Wednesday 17 October 2012.
 
President SIA, Ar Theodore Chan, President PAM, (Malaysian Institute of Architects) Ar. Saifuddin Ahmad, President Getz Group, Ray Simkins, Guest of Honour Viny Maas, distinguish guests, friends, good evening.
 
Appreciations.
Winning an Award like this is an important mile-stone in any Architect's career.  It is with admiration for the SIA and Getz Group's intentions for initiating this Architectural recognition, I say thank you.  Also more importantly, my heartfelt appreciation to my peers Ar Lok Wooi Kuan from Kuala Lumpur, Ar. Cheah Kok Ming, Ar Tan Kay Ngee and Ar Lee May Anne, all from Singapore, who have nominated and supported my nomination.  It is because of their faith in me, that I am standing here to-night.  Thank you.
 
Arch Journey linking history to sustainability..
Architecture begins with a simple vision of wanting to create beautiful spaces for People to enjoy, yet complementing the environment.  The iconic expression is always a manifestation of its spatial celebration internally.  
 
Nikolas Prevsner, in the introduction to his book "History of European Architecture" in explaining that a bicycle shed is a building but not architecture; however, a Gothic Cathedral is Architecture, made a poignant point.  So what is Architecture?
 
The bicycle shed is a product of the Industrial revolution.  Out of necessity it was invented, the frame made of steel and the tyres of rubber.  Making steel was the first industrial process that spewed carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.  Rubber is a sustainable material derived from a renewable source.  The Gothic Cathedrals were usually built of stones and timber.  Often stones from demolished churches that stood on the site were recycled.  Re-cycling is not a new concept.  Stones and timber are sustainable materials.  The cathedrals took the people many years to build using simple tools and no mechanised equipment, leaving hardly any carbon foot print in the atmosphere.
 
Aquiring Arch knowledge.
Architecture was new science to Malaya.  The then Malaya consisted of the Federated Malaya States and the Straits Settlements of Singapore, Penang and Malacca.  The students were sent off to Commonwealth countries, UK, Australia or NZ, to be educated.  
 
This was to be the first stage of globalisation.  After acquiring knowledge they returned home, that is the second stage of globalization. Back home they applied what they had learnt.  Sadly in some cases there was no application, only regurgitation.
 
Architecture of Humility and Tai Chi of Architecture.
After returning from Sydney, I went through a period to re-orientate myself to understand the peculiarities of the local situation; whereby I adopted the architectural approach, referred to as the "Architecture of Humility" to be followed by the "Tai-chi of Architecture".  
 
Prostrated on the ground in Humility we see everything at the ground level.  In this position we learn about culture, tradition, climate, the environment, people, etc. to understand what they mean and how they function in an interrelated manner with the rest of the socio-economic pattern.  After a complete understanding of the situation we are able to engage in the Tai Chi of architecture whereby we seek the strength of the opposing entity to overcome it.  
 
Meaning of Architecture.
For me Architecture is not only about icons, 'bottom-line' profits or aesthetics, but the human factor.  These buzz words have been bandied around so much that they have become meaningless.  For me,
 
Architecture is about People,
People are about Life,
Life is about Living, and
Living is about Enjoying.
Enjoying what Nature has given us.
It therefore follows that Architecture is about
Enjoying and protecting Nature; and
What Nature has given us.
 
This is the first lesson about sustainability.
 
My Architecture.in the forefront.
My architecture has always dwelled on the periphery of the mainstream architectural style, exploring ideas which were never popular at that time.  Doing architecture that is responsive to the environment; heritage, conservation and preservation of heritage, understanding vernacular architecture, arts and crafts tradition, climate, use of recycled building materials, comfort levels, awareness of energy consumption, investigating 'architecture without walls', etc. was not fashionable, not so long ago.  With the present global concern about sustainability, energy conservation, carbon emission, we have unwittingly found ourselves thrust to the forefront of this crusade.  
 
About our projects.
Our early project the Walian House, was experimentation with the concept of 'Architecture without Walls' for the tropics.  It was to be our first venture into the realm of sustainable architecture without realising its significance then.  It was to be the harbinger of things to come,   "green" architecture, passive cooling comfort, minimising carbon emission and footprint etc…. Many of our projects had earned us local as well as International architectural accolades.  The Salinger House in Kajang won us the coveted Aga Khan Award in 1998.
 
Tropics, what do we know about it?
What do we know about the tropics, the forests, hills and the seas?  
The temperate zones have four seasons.  As compared to the temperate zones what do we know about the tropics?  Very little, except that it is hot and humid.  The tropics have only two seasons; "hot and wet" and the other is "hot, wet and more wet".
 
The Sun
In the tropics,
we have a lot of Sun,
With the Sun, it is very hot.
To keep cool,
We need a shady roof,
To keep the roof cool,
we need shady trees,
With shady trees,
there are lots of leaves,
With lots of leaves,
we do not need any gutters and downpipes.
 
The RAIN
In the tropics we have alot of rain.
When it rains it pours,
We do not need gutters.
To keep ourselves dry,
we need a roof over our heads, and
walls to keep the rain out.
When the rain stops it gets hot.
That is when we do not need the walls,
for air to flow through.
When it rains again
we need the walls.
This is the contradiction of life in the tropics.
 
"Thinking out of the box" may mean challenging existing norms and entrenched values, which I often found to be troublesome, as not many people were prepared to accept them.  It has for a long time been an accepted practice that all buildings must have gutters and downpipes.  When I first removed gutters from my buildings my plans were not accepted by the Local Authorities in Malaysia.  Now I know for a fact that Singapore does not allow gutters in residential buildings.  I am vindicated.  We have also experimented with operable windows and "disappearing" walls. These are only beginning to be accepted.
 
Understanding and protecting the Tropics
As a result of our curiosity, to understand the tropics we studied and listened to its rhythm and heartbeats. This culminated in ideas for "The rites of the Tropics"; our continuing search for meaningfulness in our region, environment and therefore our architecture.  The Rites of the Tropics embodies the essence of tropical celebration into twelve areas for inclusion into our architecture.
 
 This continuing search for answers to our questions about tropical architecture is only made possible by the encouragement and endorsement of our friends, clients and like minded people from all works of life.  Architecture is a crowded profession but at times we find ourselves in the wilderness.  To survive in the wilderness one needs to be vigilant.  In so doing we are consciously maintaining an awareness and concern for our environment.  The environment is a global heritage and inheritance.
 
Using Timber from the rainforests.
As a practising Architect in the tropics I seek new directions and ideas from our built and natural environment.  The forests that produced timber easily and rapidly caught my interest.  They are there and inexpensive to use, why not use them in deference instead of the norm, "RC(reinforced concrete) with brick in-fills".  That was so years ago.  Today timber is one of the most sought after and valuable materials in building.  To be able to construct a timber building today is a luxury.
 
With the exorbitant cost of timber and its increasing scarcity, I started to explore alternative sustainable substitutes, using more re-cycled timber, bamboo or smaller sized timber slats to construct larger composite components for my architecture.  Many of these ideas are still in their experimental stage and need public acceptance.
 
That the tropical rainforest and rainforest products are singled out as endangered requiring 'global' protection seems lopsided.  After all why aren't the forests of the Spanish plains replanted?  The trees were chopped to build ships for the invasion of South America.  There are very few Kauri trees in the North Island of NZ; where have they all gone?  I am not advocating the indiscriminate deforestation like in some parts of Malaysia, but a genuine collaboration across borders to protect the forests.
 
Conservation and Heritage
From this perspective founding the Badan Warisan Malaysia, (Heritage Malaysia Trust), an NGO, together with some like-minded people, was part of the natural process of one's architectural appreciation.  It is important to preserve our heritage for posterity, something like a memory bank for a city or country to remember its past.  It serves as an important repository for research.
 
Institute activities.
As part of Life's evolutionary process, we are under an obligation to pass on our knowledge to future generations. The architectural profession has to perpetuate itself. I was very involved in various capacities in the Malaysian Institute of Architects, eventually becoming its President in 1992.
 
Mentoring.
By virtue of our profession, architects are compelled to be educators, educating the public and students about environmental protection, and the larger global responsibility of protecting the earth's resources.  We must be involved in mentoring future architects, students, interacting with architectural trainees, pointing them in the right direction, generating in them social conscience. Protecting the urban and natural environment is a commitment.  It is a commitment that embraces a sense of responsibility, urgency and diligence.  
 
Conclusion.
Preserving our heritage, both our man-made and natural environment are issues which fall within our responsibilities as architects.  This is part of our social responsibility. We are morally compelled to hand over to the future what we received from the past in a good shape - no less.  We are but temporal custodians for the future.  Conserving our heritage represents a continuing challenge to humanity.  It is as always,
 
Today was Yesterday's Tomorrow,
as,
Today will be Tomorrow's Yesterday.




 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Fwd: 20 Pykett illegal demolition

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Yan Lee" <leeyan.c@gmail.com>
Date: Oct 31, 2012 7:08 PM
Subject: 20 Pykett illegal demolition
To: "limguaneng@penang.gov.my" <limguaneng@penang.gov.my>
Cc: "Andrew Yong" <andrew@yong.at>, "Khoo Salma" <snkhoo@gmail.com>, "Penang Heritage Trust" <info@pht.org.my>, "georgetown world heritage inc" <info@gtwhi.com.my>, "Patahiyah Bt Ismail" <hiyah@mppp.gov.my>

CM

One important issue is that of the illegal demolition of the old bungalows in Penang without planning permission.

I am proud of all the effort all Penangites to conserve and protect our Heritage.

As per your speech on YouTube when Pudu Jail was demolished

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQh97nNt6wg&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Please note your speech especially starting from 33 seconds of the video.


It is paramount that developers from Kuala Lumpur are made aware that illegal demolition is not tolerated in Penang a UNESCO Heritage city. All will be lost if they are allowed to demolish buildings and pay a small fine. In this case a RM 6,000.00 fine compared to the Gross Development Value of their project of RM500 million.

As you are aware by now no fine is big enough for developers as they will just pass it on to the end user, your rakyat.

As a deterrent to all developers, planning permission shall not be considered for 20 years.

My fellow Penangites are all concern about our heritage.

For Penang I have volunteered to assist GTWHI the guardian of our heritage city.

Yours sincerely
Yan Lee
Llb hons ( Newcastle upon Tyne)







Confusion over ‘Robin Hood issue



Wednesday October 24, 2012

Confusion over 'Robin Hood issue'

ANALYSIS BY JOCELINE TAN
joceline@thestar.com.my


The twists and turns in the Taman Manggis land issue in Penang is starting to resemble a soap opera but it has also raised the question of whether the legal procedures are observed in the sale of state land.

THE showdown over a plot of land known as Taman Manggis or "mangosteen garden" in the heart of George Town is about to erupt in another slanging match on Nov 3.

Dubbed by some as the "Robin Hood story", the Taman Manggis land has become one of the most controversial issues in Penang.

It has also become a rather entertaining saga of gamesmanship between Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng and his political secretary Ng Wei Aik on one side and the state Barisan Nasional Youth on the other.

The 0.4ha of land had been designated for affordable housing but before the project could take place, Barisan was toppled.

Lim's administration has since reportedly sold the land for RM11mil to a Kuala Lumpur company that is planning to build a health tourism facility that includes a private dental hospital and hotel on the site.

That was how the Robin Hood thing came about, but with a twist where Barisan is accusing the Pakatan Rakyat government of being a distorted version of Robin Hood by taking land meant for the poor to give to the rich.

When Barisan accused the state government of selling the land at below market rate, Lim challenged it to buy the land for RM22.4mil. Lim probably thought Barisan would not take up the dare. After all, RM22.4mil is not small change.

But Barisan agreed and announced that it had set up a special purpose company to buy and develop affordable homes on the land.

Caught on one foot, the state government was forced to respond and Ng issued an offer letter to Barisan.

And that was when the soap opera began.

The Barisan side led by its State Barisan Youth chief Oh Tong Keong proceeded to pay 1% earnest money as is called for in such transactions.

The next step, as anyone would know, is for the lawyers from both sides to draw up a sales and purchase (S&P) agreement.

Once that is signed, the buyer would pay the balance of the requisite 10% and depending on the terms and condition, the full amount is usually paid within three months or more.

This is to enable the buyer to raise funds or secure a loan from the bank.

However, following the 1% payment, Lim demanded that the Barisan pay up the rest of the amount within a month.

The outlandish demand saw a few jaws drop on the Barisan side.

First, it is not possible for Barisan to cough up that kind of money in so short a time.

Another was the audacity of the demand.

"There is no S&P agreement in sight and the seller is demanding the full amount. Do they understand the laws of transaction? Without an S&P agreement, no one would want to pay RM22.4mil," said architect Khoo Boo Soon.

Khoo, who was the former building director of the Penang Island Municipal Council (MPPP), is quite appalled at the frivolous way that state property is being treated.

He is incredulous that state land is being sold based on an offer letter by a political secretary on the instruction of the Chief Minister.

"I have been a government servant for more than 17 years. As far as I know, land transactions have to be discussed and decided by the state exco, the state legal adviser has to be consulted, the state secretary has to be involved. It cannot be a one-man decision, both parties need to sign an S&P agreement," said Khoo.

The Barisan side was more direct.

"This is government land, it belongs to the people. The land does not belong to the Chief Minister's grandfather. We are not buying a bicycle or a car, this is about public land costing millions of ringgit," said Oh.

The Barisan side had on Oct 3 written to the state government requesting for an S&P agreement before they proceed to pay up the rest of the money.

On Oct 8, the state secretary wrote back asking them to refer to the offer letter and to pay up within a month.

To compound this half-past-six state of affairs, rumours abound that the land has actually been sold to the Kuala Lumpur company.

No one can tell for sure because the state government has been tight-lipped about the issue.

Requests for information on the actual status of the land has run up against a stone wall.

On top of all that, the house that Lim is renting in Penang reportedly belongs to the wife of the major stakeholder of the Kuala Lumpur company.

The lady is also the cousin of state exco member Phee Boon Poh.

The implication of all this is unclear but it does add spice to the story.

Many people following this soap opera are quite confused but that is what makes soap operas so addictive – there are lots of twists and turns.

The more discerning think Lim has no intention of selling the land to Barisan, hence the conditions and obstacles put in the way.

Some suspect the delay tactics are aimed at making Barisan give up.

But it would be a blow to Lim's administration if the Barisan people actually purchased it and proceeded to build low-cost housing.

Lim would lose face, particularly given that his administration has failed to build any affordable housing since coming into power.

To make matters worse, this is happening amid an inflated property market on the island and where house prices have soared beyond the reach of 80% of wage earners.

Lim should be transparent about the issue.

If the land has been sold, he should admit it.

If it is still in the state's hands, then he should do the decent thing and use it for its original purpose.

Instead he is angry at being criticised and is punishing those who want to build affordable homes by doubling the price of the land.

A Penang lawyer said he is not surprised about the "Robin Hood issue".

"What shocks me is the silence on the part of the Penang NGOs. They used to be so vocal on issues affecting public interest," said the lawyer.

In the meantime, the countdown to Nov 3 has begun.

  • E-mail this story
  • Print this story
  • Bookmark and Share
 

Monday 29 October 2012

PenangGOV to start review of the structure plan

Public consultations to be held else you are not a people centric government. 


Thank you for a new Malaysia. 



Monday October 29, 2012

Penang govt starts reviewing 2020 structure plan


THE Penang government has started reviewing the Penang Structure Plan 2020 after it reached its five-year term since being gazetted on June 28, 2007.

State Town and Country Planning, Housing and Arts Committee chairman Wong Hon Wai said it was a statutory requirement under the Town and Country Planning Act for the state to re-examine the plan every five years.

"We have just recently started the review last month by having workshops for internal departments.

"Usually, it takes more than a year to complete the process; thus, we expect it to wrap up by end of next year," he told a press conference before launching the 'PIP Property and Home Showcase' in Penang Times Square on Friday.

Wong said its department had been assigned to spearhead the review exercise that involved consultation with stakeholders, non-governmental organisations and public.

"Throughout the process, we will incorporate the various issues and proposals raised in the press which included hillslope development.

"Subsequently, we will have an exhibition to display the amended structure plan for public review and hearing," he explained.

The structure plan is a policy framework and guidelines for spatial planning and physical development for the state.

  • E-mail this story
  • Print this story
  • Bookmark and Share
 
 

SEARCH ALLMALAYSIA.INFO TRAVEL PACKAGES

  to